What are PFAS and why are they an environmental challenge?

PFAS have become a health and environmental concern in recent years. They are a very large group of chemicals that have been used for decades for their properties and are now beginning to pose important questions for many industries.

Where are they? Can they be present in our processes? Can they reach the water or the soil? How are they detected? And, if they appear, can they be eliminated?

It is not always easy to answer these questions. PFAS form a very large family of compounds, with different behaviors, and their high persistence makes their management a challenge for both the industry and those of us who work in environmental protection.

Therefore, knowing them is the first step.

 

What are PFAS?

PFAS is the name given to a large family of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances. They are synthetic chemical compounds that have been used for decades in numerous industrial applications and consumer products.

They all have one thing in common: they contain bonds between carbon and fluorine atoms. These bonds are among the strongest in organic chemistry and are precisely what give PFAS some of their most useful properties: resistance to heat, water, grease or degradation.

The problem is that the same stability that is so useful in a product can become a problem when these substances reach the environment.

Some PFAS can remain for long periods of time without degrading easily. Hence, terms such as “eternal chemicals” or “forever chemicals have become popular”. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)  considers PFAS a family of substances with a high persistence and proposes measures to reduce their emissions into the environment.

And here the challenge begins: we are not talking about a single substance, but a very broad family of compounds, with different characteristics and behaviours.

 

 

In what products and activities can we find PFAS?

Although in recent years we have heard about PFAS mainly because of their presence in consumer products, their use is also related to numerous industrial activities.

We can find them, among other applications, in:

  • Non-stick coatings and utensils.
  • Waterproof and stain-resistant fabrics.
  • Certain cosmetics and personal care products.
  • Paints, coatings and other industrial products.
  • Foams used in firefighting.
  • Industrial processes where water, heat or grease resistance properties are required.

The EFSA, the European Food Safety Authority, includes, among others, applications in non-stick utensils, food packaging, water-repellent garments and firefighting foams. It also points out that PFAS can be released into the environment from manufacturing facilities, landfills or wastewater treatment plants.

This is important because a company does not have to be directly using a substance identified as PFAS for there to be a possibility of presence in any of its streams.

It can be related to a raw material, an auxiliary product, a coating, a process or even to activities that are not directly part of production.

Therefore, when we talk about PFAS in the industry, the first question should not only be, do we have PFAS, but also, where could they be and how could they get to the environment?

 

Why are PFAS of concern? What impact do they have on health?

The concern about PFAS has two aspects: health and environmental.

Not all PFAS exhibit the same behavior or risk profile. Some of the most studied substances, such as PFOA or PFOS, have been the subject of numerous investigations and evaluations by scientific and regulatory bodies.

The available evidence suggests that exposure to certain PFAS may be associated with different health effects. EFSA considers the decreased immune system response to vaccination as the critical effect used in its assessment of PFOA, PFOS, PFNA and PFHxS. Other effects have also been studied, such as increased cholesterol levels and the related consequences of this.

But there is still much to know. The enormous number of compounds that make up this family means that we do not have the same level of information for all of them, and we do not fully know what can happen when there is simultaneous exposure to different PFAS.

This does not mean that we should wait until we have all the answers to act. It is precisely the persistence of these substances that makes prevention and control particularly important.

 

What impact do PFAS have on the environment?

 

This is where PFAS pose an especially complex problem.

Unlike other contaminants that can degrade relatively easily, certain PFAS can remain in the medium for a long time. In addition, some have high mobility and can move through water and soil.

This means that pollution that originates in a specific point can end up affecting other media.

For example, a PFAS present in wastewater can reach a treatment plant. A substance that is not properly retained can continue its journey. Similarly, a release to the soil can end up affecting groundwater.

And here comes an added difficulty: PFAS can be found in very low concentrations. Detecting them requires proper analytical methods and, above all, knowing what you are looking for.

That’s why characterization is so important. Before we think about how to remove a contamination, we need to understand it.

 

How can PFAS get into water?

 

The entry routes can be very different and depend on each activity.

In an industry they can be related to raw materials or products used during the process. They can also appear in wastewater, process water or streams generated during certain operations.

In other cases, the origin may be in previous activities, in firefighting facilities or in a historical contamination of the soil that has ended up affecting groundwater.

This means that finding PFAS in water does not always allow its origin to be immediately identified.

The route must be reconstructed: to know the activity, to review the materials and processes used, to analyse the water and, when necessary, also to study the soil and subsoil.

It’s not just about finding a PFAS. It’s about understanding where it’s coming from, where it can go, and what can happen if it stays in the middle.

For ESOLVE, this approach is part of a broader vision of environmental management: to act on the problem from its source and not only when the pollution has already reached the environment. It is also the approach we apply in our subsoil engineering and environmental work.

 

Why are PFAS so difficult to remove?

PFAS present a particular challenge for water treatment due to the high stability of their chemical bonds.

But there’s another difficulty that’s sometimes overlooked: Not all PFAS are created equal.

Its structure, chain length, concentration and behaviour in water can be different. In addition, the characteristics of the water itself. Its composition, organic matter, salts and other emerging contaminants. All can influence the operation of a treatment.

That is why there is no single technology that is the best solution for all cases.

Technologies that can be used to remove PFAS from water include granular activated carbon, ion exchange resins, and different membrane processes. These are solutions that can be very useful, but you need to consider what happens to PFAS once removed from water: they can be concentrated in another stream or waste that will need to be managed.

And this difference is important.

Removing a PFAS from water does not always mean destroying it.

There are also technologies aimed at the destruction of these compounds, including certain advanced oxidation processes. Their application and efficiency will depend on the characteristics of each case.

At ESOLVE we work on the development and application of technologies to face challenges related to emerging contaminants such as PFAS. Our research and development (R+D+i) line combines advanced diagnostics, applied research and technological development.

And we also have experience in real PFAS treatment projects. In the European LIFE-SOURCE project, for example, ESOLVE designed and built large-scale treatment equipment for the remediation of contaminated groundwater, combining different technologies such as anion exchange resins, active foam fractionation and electrochemical oxidation.

But even in these cases, technology is not the first step.

Before deciding how to treat contaminated water, it is necessary to know what PFAS are present, in what concentration and what the matrix we want to treat is like.

There is no one-size-fits-all solution. You have to understand the problem first.

 

What can an industry do in the face of the challenge of PFAS?

European regulation is moving towards greater control of these substances and more and more activities will have to pay attention to their possible presence.

In March 2026, ECHA’s scientific committees  endorsed a proposal for a restriction at EU level, with certain exceptions and measures to minimise emissions. The regulatory process continues to move forward.

But waiting for a particular obligation to appear may not be the best strategy.

For a company, anticipating can mean reviewing where PFAS can be used, identifying potential routes of entry into water, knowing what substances may be present in its processes, and establishing controls to detect a problem before it becomes a major contamination.

And if PFAS are already present, the path starts somewhere else: characterizing the contamination.

What compounds are there?, In what concentrations?, Where are they?, How are they moving?, What risk is there?, What treatment can work in these conditions?

They are different questions, and answering them well is what allows good decisions to be made later.

In this sense, ESOLVE water treatment addresses the treatment of wastewater, groundwater and process water precisely taking into account the growing need to treat contaminants such as PFAS, drugs and other emerging contaminants.

 

The Future of Environmental Management of PFAS

PFAS management is entering a new phase.

For years, much of the effort has focused on identifying certain compounds and setting limits for their presence. But the enormous diversity of PFAS and their persistence make it increasingly clear that the problem cannot be tackled solely compound-by-compound when contamination is already present.

European regulation is driving this change. In addition to the general proposal to restrict PFAS, there are already specific restrictions for certain groups and uses. ECHA, for example, includes restrictions for certain PFAS substances and notes that the restriction of PFAS in firefighting foams will begin to apply in October 2026.

For the industry, this means that it will be increasingly important to know what substances are used, how they can reach the environment and what alternatives and solutions exist.

It also means that it will be necessary to bring together two pieces of knowledge that have long worked more separately: knowledge of the industrial process and environmental knowledge.

The industry knows its process. Environmental specialists can help understand what happens when substances leave that process and reach the water, soil or subsoil.

And that collaboration will become increasingly important.

In fact, at ESOLVE we are also working on this connection between scientific knowledge and practical application. In 2026 we have started a collaboration with the CSIC to deepen the analysis of water contaminated with PFAS and the knowledge of its behaviour in real conditions.

Because the solution doesn’t start when a PFAS shows up in a test.

Start earlier, understanding where it may be and how it can reach the environment. And when the problem already exists, start by characterizing it well so that you can decide how to act.

PFAS force us, in short, to change the way we look at environmental management a little.

It is not just a matter of complying with a limit or installing a treatment. It is about knowing the problem, preventing when we are still in time and finding the right solution when the contamination is already there.

And on that path, understanding what we have in front of us is always the first step.

Industrial floor contamination: the invisible risk that can affect your company.

Soil pollution is no longer just an environmental issue. Today it also represents an operational, regulatory and economic risk for many industries.

For years, numerous subsoil conditions have remained invisible until they appear at the worst possible time: an environmental audit, a purchase and sale operation, an industrial expansion or a regulatory change.

And the current context is accelerating that pressure. Regulatory developments, the monitoring of persistent pollutants and the growing demand for sustainability are forcing companies to anticipate risks that may have previously gone unnoticed.

Especially in industrial, energy, logistics or waste management sectors, the management of contaminated soil has become a strategic issue.

 

What is soil pollution?

Soil contamination occurs when chemical substances or residues alter its natural characteristics and create a risk to human health, ecosystems or the industrial environment.

In many cases, the problem does not appear immediately. Certain pollutants can remain for years in the subsoil, migrating slowly and increasing the technical and economic complexity of their management.

It is precisely this ability to evolve silently that makes soil contamination one of the most difficult environmental risks to detect in time.

 

Main causes of industrial soil pollution

Although each site has specific characteristics, there are several recurrent outbreaks that are still responsible for a large part of the conditions currently detected.

 

Chemical leaks and spills

Small losses repeated over years can cause significant contamination without visible evidence on the surface.

Fuels, solvents, hydrocarbons, industrial oils or certain chemical compounds can progressively infiltrate the ground if they are not detected in time.

 

Tanks and buried pipelines

Buried infrastructure continues to be one of the main historical sources of soil contamination.

Corrosion, ageing materials or lack of maintenance can lead to leaks that are difficult to identify at an early stage.

 

Historical waste management

Many industrial sites maintain environmental liabilities associated with practices carried out decades ago under regulatory frameworks that are very different from those of today.

This causes certain conditions to appear years later, especially during industrial transformation processes, changes in land use or corporate transactions.

 

How to detect possible soil contamination?

One of the main challenges of soil contamination is that it rarely shows obvious signs in its early stages.

For this reason, early identification requires specific environmental investigations that allow us to know the real state of the subsoil and evaluate possible associated risks.

Among the main tools used are:

  • Exploratory and detailed research.
  • Soil and groundwater sampling campaigns.
  • Chemical laboratory analysis.
  • Preparation of conceptual models of the site.
  • Quantitative risk assessments.

Acting preventively allows conditions to be detected before they generate significant operational, regulatory or economic impacts.

 

Risks associated with contaminated soils

The impact of contaminated soil goes far beyond the environmental dimension.

The consequences can directly affect:

  • Operational continuity.
  • The viability of projects.
  • Corporate reputation.
  • The value of assets.
  • Regulatory compliance.

The main risks include:

  • Increased remediation costs.
  • Limitations on future use of the site.
  • Delays in industrial or urban planning operations.
  • Legal and administrative responsibilities.
  • Reputational impacts on investors, administrations and stakeholders.

In many cases, the true magnitude of the problem can only be determined by an environmental risk analysis.

 

The importance of acting preventively

In environmental management, acting late usually translates into more complex interventions, higher costs and less decision-making power.

That is why more and more companies are betting on preventive strategies based on:

  • Early environmental research.
  • Characterization of the subsoil.
  • Risk assessment.
  • Environmental monitoring.
  • Advanced decontamination technologies tailored to each site.

The emergence of complex and persistent pollutants, such as PFAS, is also driving the development of new remediation solutions, on-site treatments and advanced technologies capable of improving the efficiency and sustainability of decontamination processes.

The key is no longer just to decontaminate when the problem appears. The real difference is in anticipating the risk before it impacts the operation or the business.

 

A new approach to soil decontamination

The current complexity of pollutants requires solutions capable of combining technical knowledge, innovation and the ability to act in real industrial environments.

At ESOLVE we develop research, characterisation and soil decontamination projects from an integrated perspective, adapting each solution to the specific needs of each site and pollutant.

Because today, correctly managing contaminated soil is not only an environmental obligation. It is also a strategic decision to reduce risks, protect assets and ensure the continuity of industrial activity.

 

Are you planning to carry out a sale of assets, an industrial expansion or do you need to assess possible environmental risks?

At ESOLVE we carry out soil quality research, risk analysis and decontamination projects adapted to each case.

Our team can help you identify, characterize, and manage soil contamination before it becomes an operational, economic, or regulatory issue. Request a personalized study.

Black water and grey water: Environmental differences, risks and solutions

On a daily basis, our activity generates a large amount of waste, among which waste water occupies a critical place due to its volume and complexity. However, not all waste water is the same: its origin, whether domestic or industrial, and previous use determine its level of pollutant load and the specific treatment required to neutralize its impact.

At ESOLVE, we understand that the management of these effluents is a fundamental pillar of the protection of the subsoil. In this article, we look at the difference between black and grey water, the risks of poor management, and how advanced monitoring is the key to a sustainable future.

 

What differentiates black water from grey water?

Within the domestic sphere/daily use, it is vital to classify water according to its origin in order to apply the appropriate technical solution:

  • Black water: It comes mainly from toilets and contains a high load of organic matter (faeces and urine). They are the main source of microorganisms and pollutants.
  • Grey water: Its generated in showers, sinks or sinks that do not contain faecal bacteria. They are usually soapy waters that can carry grease, suspended solids and emerging contaminants such as microplastics.

On a technical level, the main distinction lies in the pollutant load: black waters has a significantly higher potential for environmental impact, requiring more complex purification processes.

For their part, the volume and lower pollutant load of grey water make them ideal candidates for the circular economy. In this sense, the new Royal Decree 1085/2024 on water reuse establishes an updated framework to promote the use of reclaimed water, promoting more efficient management of available water resources.

 

Environmental impact: The risks of poor management

Undetected filtration or poor management of these effluents can lead to critical scenarios for the environment:

 

Infiltration into soils and aquifers

Black waters filtration severely degrades the chemical composition of the soil. In permeable soils, the risk increases: Black waters can reach underground aquifers, compromising the quality of drinking water sources. For this reason, at ESOLVE we prioritise subsoil protection and characterisation treatments, following the damage assessment criteria established in Royal Decree 665/2023

 

Health and biodiversity risks

  • Pathogens: Untreated water spreads infectious diseases through bacteria and viruses.
  • Ecosystems: Uncontrolled dumping can catastrophically alter habitats, disrupting the balance necessary for the survival of animal and plant species.
  • Emissions: The decomposition of organic matter in sewage generates greenhouse gases and harmful gases such as methane, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon dioxide.

 

Diffuse pollution: The challenge of maintenance

One of the biggest challenges for companies and municipalities is diffuse or non-point pollution. Often, old septic systems or sewer systems that are not properly maintained have leaks that are difficult to locate. Although they are difficult to detect with the naked eye, their impact due to accumulation can be devastating to the environment. For this reason, administrations reinforce control over these deficiencies through technical frameworks such as the MITECO Discharge Legislation, which seeks to regulate overflows in sanitation systems to minimise accidental pollution.

 

ESOLVE: Experts in environmental solutions and monitoring

Wastewater management has ceased to be a purely domestic affair and has become a large-scale environmental challenge that requires technical rigor. The correct management of effluents, both industrial and domestic, is a shared responsibility that involves us all. At ESOLVE, we contribute our experience to transform this challenge into a guarantee of security:

  • Advanced monitoring : We implement control systems to detect leaks and prevent impacts before they become irreversible.
  • Soil diagnosis: We analyze the possible impact on aquifers and soils due to accidental discharges or deficient systems.
  • Prevention and Sustainability: We help organizations comply with regulations, ensuring the health of ecosystems for future generations.

 

Do you need to ensure the environmental integrity of your facilities? At ESOLVE we help you monitor, solve and prevent any problem arising from wastewater management.

Contact our technical team at esolve.es

Recovering territories: a long-term environmental, social and economic investment

The recovery of polluted soil and water has become one of the great environmental and territorial challenges of the coming decades. Former industrial areas, closed landfills or spaces degraded by past activities today represent not only an environmental liability, but also a strategic opportunity for sustainable development.

It must be considered that these urban areas where land is very valuable to house new facilities such as schools, hospitals, parks and areas with common spaces, housing… the well-being of the people must be ensured and this involves regenerating the subsoil.

Far from being a one-off action, environmental remediation is a complex technical process that combines diagnosis, intervention and long-term monitoring. Its objective is not only to eliminate pollutants, but also to ensure that the territory can recover safe uses that are compatible with its environment and its community.

Polluted soil limits the urban, economic and social development of a territory. Their recovery makes it possible to unlock spaces that would otherwise remain unused for decades. Disused industrial areas can be transformed into productive areas, natural spaces or green infrastructures that add real value to the territory.

In addition, these processes reduce risks to human health, improve environmental quality and contribute to more efficient territorial planning, aligned with the objectives of sustainability and circular economy.

Decontamination has a direct effect on ecosystems. Improving soil and water quality promotes the recovery of basic ecological functions and allows biodiversity to be progressively re-established. This process, based on scientific and technical criteria, is key to restoring environmental balances that have been altered for years.

Environmental monitoring after remediation is essential to ensure the stability of results and the safety of new land uses.

Each recovery project is unique and must be approached with an in-depth knowledge of the site, its history and its context. The characterization of the terrain, the selection of appropriate technologies and the management of the associated risks are critical phases to ensure the success of the action.

We can find old industrial areas that present problems of bad smells and leaks of contaminated water as a result of poor soil recovery. Or expanding companies that want to grow responsibly and assume the environmental liabilities of the past so that they understand that they have to generate wealth in healthy environments.

Polluted soil affects the water cycle Portability is threatened by the presence of contaminants in the water and subsoil.

That is why at ESOLVE we approach environmental recovery from a comprehensive perspective, combining engineering, consulting and environmental monitoring to offer solutions adapted to each case. Our goal is to turn degraded spaces into functional, safe territories with a future.

The recovery of soil and water is not only a response to a problem of the past, but a key tool for building more resilient, sustainable territories prepared for the environmental challenges of the present and the future.

Regenerating today to protect our tomorrow: environmental balance for 2025 and keys to 2026

Talking about sustainability is no longer a trend. It is a necessity. And 2025 has been a year that has made this clear on many fronts: regulatory, technical, social and, above all, operational.

Soil and water management has gone from being a secondary issue to occupying a central place in the strategic decisions of companies and administrations. Not because of fashion, but because environmental, economic and reputational risks are more evident today than ever.

At ESOLVE we have accompanied this change from within, working on the ground and actively participating in projects where regeneration was not an option, but a responsibility.

2025: A turning point for environmental management

During this year, dynamics that were already pointed out in previous years have been consolidated, but in 2025 they have gained real weight:

  • Water protection has become a cross-cutting priority, driven by episodes of water stress and increased regulatory demands.
  • The recovery of contaminated soils has acquired a new strategic value, especially in former industrial enclaves destined to be transformed.
  • Technology applied to environmental characterization has made it possible to make more precise and better-informed decisions.
  • And, increasingly, organizations have understood that acting preventively reduces risks and generates long-term value.

This context has changed the way environmental projects are approached: it is no longer just a matter of complying, but of doing it well.

From data to decision: the value of rigorous characterization

One of the great lessons learned from 2025 has been to confirm something essential: the quality of the diagnosis conditions the entire subsequent process.

Investing in a comprehensive characterization of soil and water allows:

  • Define more effective remediation strategies.
  • Reduce technical and regulatory uncertainties.
  • Optimize time and costs.
  • And minimize impacts on existing activity.

Applied science, when integrated from the beginning of the project, ceases to be a technical requirement to become a strategic tool.

Innovation that translates into real solutions

Environmental innovation has demonstrated its true usefulness this year when it has been able to materialize in concrete solutions:

  • Less invasive remediation technologies, supporting operational continuity.
  • Predictive models and analytics tools that improve decision-making.
  • R+D projects focused on more sustainable solutions from an energy and environmental point of view.

In this context, innovation does not mean experimenting aimlessly, but rather applying knowledge with criteria and responsibility.

Regeneration is also a social commitment

Beyond the technical, 2025 has reinforced a key idea: environmental regeneration has a direct impact on people.

Every reclaimed soil and protected body of water contributes to:

  • Safer and healthier environments.
  • New opportunities for land use.
  • Greater trust between companies, administrations and citizens.

Remediation is no longer an invisible process but an action with a real impact on the environment and the community.

2026: growing demand and new opportunities

Next year will come with clear challenges: more regulatory pressure, new pollutants to control and a growing demand for well-founded environmental solutions. But it will also open up opportunities for those who are prepared.

Everything points to the fact that in 2026 we will see:

  • Greater integration of science in decision-making.
  • Companies that are more proactive and demanding of their technical partners.
  • An increasingly important role of remediation in the transition to more sustainable production models.

At ESOLVE we face this scenario with a clear conviction: the combination of technical rigour, innovation and purpose is the basis for moving forward.

Looking forward with responsibility

Regenerating soil and protecting water is not only about solving an environmental problem. It is taking care of the future, anticipating risks and assuming a real commitment to the territory.

At ESOLVE we will continue to work to provide solutions based on science, knowledge and experience, accompanying companies and administrations in projects that require precision, vision and responsibility.

Because protecting what belongs to everyone cannot wait.

ESOLVE | We look after tomorrow, regenerating polluted environments.